G Scott Blakley
Trying to make sense of politics
Navigation
  • About
  • Mind&Politics
  • Jacob Jefferson Jakes
  • I.A. Grea
You are here: Home › Political Commentary › Deconstructing Health Care Costs
← Political Commentary: The Standard Form, in triplicate
Democracy and Religion →

Deconstructing Health Care Costs

14 April 2012 | Filed under: Political Commentary and tagged with: chronic disease, elderly health care expenses, health care costs, health care expenditures, reduce health care costs

Health care costs by the numbers:

  • Americans spend $7500 per capita on health care. This is the highest in the world. The nation with the next highest spending is Norway, at $5000; we spend 50% more. Even though our spending on health care is higher, our health outcomes are generally worse than those of other industrialized nations.1
  • In 2002, 5% of the people with the highest health care expenses in the U.S spent 49% of the overall health care dollar. On the other hand, 50% of the population spends just 3% of the overall health care dollar.2
  • The elderly tend to spend more of the health care dollar. At 13% of the population in 2002, they spend 36% of the overall health care dollar.
  • In 2002, the five most expensive health conditions were heart disease, cancer, trauma, mental disorders, and pulmonary conditions. They account for about one-third of all health care spending. 25% of Medicare beneficiaries account for 85% of all Medicare spending; among the 25% of these beneficiaries, 75% have one or more of the top 7 most expensive medical conditions.2
  • The rise in spending on the five most expensive health conditions between 1987 and 2002 was related to the rising numbers of people with the conditions, rather than a rise in the amount of spending per person with the conditions.2
  • 10% of all health care spending, and 25-30% of all Medicare spending, goes to those in their last year of life.3
  • The difference between health care expenditures for the elderly and the non-elderly is greater in the U.S. than in other industrialized nations. This difference is in part explained by the fact that the elderly in the U.S. have virtually universal coverage, more than the non-elderly; other industrialized nations have more universal coverage at all ages, and so don’t see this steep rise.4
  • The cost per health visit or procedure is much more expensive in the U.S. than in other industrialized nations.5
  • Health care administration costs are over $1000 per capita in the U.S. compared to $300 in Canada. The percentage of administrative and clerical personnel in the U.S. health care labor force grew 50%, from 18% to 27%, between 1969 and 1999.6

If most of our health care spending goes to the elderly and those suffering from chronic disease, then most of our effort to reduce spending needs to be concentrated there. Since the rise in spending on patients with chronic diseases results from an increasing number of patients with chronic disease, rather than an increasing cost of individual treatment, then prevention would be in order.7 For care at the end of life, we need to be less aggressive at treating conditions which will not extend life or contribute to its quality.

If our goal were to reduce health care spending to the level of other industrialized nations, we might want to concentrate on reducing expenditures in areas where we spend more. The McKinsley Quarterly has a well-done report on Why Americans pay more for health care8 The most prominent categories in which U.S. health spending exceeds that of other countries are outpatient services, pharmaceutical prices, and health administration and services. The report notes the difficulties we face in trying to bring health care costs down, including:

  • Demand. People are less healthy and require more services, and there is no value consciousness, since individuals only pay 12% of the total health care costs.
  • Supply. In other industries, innovation tends to drive prices down, but this is not the case for innovation in health care, which tends toward more expensive equipment and procedures. The report cites this as a difficult problem to overcome: how do we promote innovation, which tends to drive costs up, and not drive those costs up?
  • Intermediation. Fee-for-service reimbursement increases incentives to provide more health care than is necessary; fear of malpractice contributes, as well. The report also notes that Medicare prices become a benchmark for private insurance to follow, but that Medicare’s cost-plus formula reduces pressure on providers to reduce costs.

It seems that prescriptions for reigning in health care spending will require attacking several different areas, and that the more simplistic recommendations from either the liberal or conservative side of the political sphere are not sufficient.

1 Health Care Spending in the United States and Selected OECD Countries
April 2011
; It’s a Ripoff! -or- Why America Spends So Much on Health Care
2 The High Concentration of U.S. Health Care Expenditures
3 The Economics of Dying; How Much Do We Spend on End-of-Life Care?
4 Health Care Expenditures in the OECD
5 International Federation of Health Plans 2009 Comparative Price Report Medical and Hospital Fees by Country
6 Costs of Health Care Administration in the United States and Canada
7 Prevention: The Answer To Curbing Chronically High Health Care Costs (Guest Opinion)
8 Why Americans pay more for health care

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by G Scott Blakley

← Political Commentary: The Standard Form, in triplicate
Democracy and Religion →

RSS Digby at Hullabaloo

  • Untitled 12 January 2020 dp

RSS FiveThirtyEight

RSS 2 Political Junkies

  • Fetterman Friday 16 May 2025 David

G Scott Blakley

  • View GScottBlakley-550324388472440’s profile on Facebook
  • View 116117354114634973050’s profile on Google+

Mind&Politics

  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Facebook
  • View mindandpolitics’s profile on Twitter
  • View 107647165319384338834’s profile on Google+

Recent Posts

  • Jerry Falwell has set me free! 14 October 2018
  • The End of the World is Nigh 4 June 2017
  • Ultimately, Constitutional Democracy Prevailed 21 May 2017
  • Trump, American Culture, and Politics 2 April 2017
  • It’s 2020. Who are you going to vote for? 8 May 2016
  • How Can You Tell a Conservative is Lying? 21 February 2016
  • Donald Trump and the Dalai Lama 22 December 2015
  • Libertarians and Our Better Angels 29 November 2015
  • Trump and Sanders Speak Their Minds 23 August 2015
  • The Tea Party Declares Victory; Obama has Delivered 3 August 2014

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Categories

    Tags

    2016 election ACA ALEC Bernie Sanders Chattanooga EPB climate change communism conservatives constitution Corey Robin Dan Kahan David Brooks debt ceiling Democracy Democratic party Dog Whistle Politics Donald Trump EITC Friedrich Hayek government shutdown health care costs Hillary Clinton income inequality Koch brothers liberalism libertarianism Lincoln Labs low wages Marco Rubio Mark Meckler minimum wage net neutrality Obamacare Paul Ryan plutocracy Rand Paul Reason magazine Republican party Ron Paul Schuette v. BAMN stupid party taxes tea party Walmart Wendy Davis

    © 2025 G Scott Blakley

    Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress